Did you read the whole post? The 60hz source is primarily about TV.
Originally posted Feb 2010, updated March 2013, yet still is talking about gaming in terms of HD5xxx series. Where's HD6xxx, HD7xxx, Nvidia 6xx, 7xx? Crossfire/SLI? The rest of the GAMING related info is a mix of calculations instead of actual use, out of date information and some out right errors (DL DVI bandwith for example). I think the guy knows electronics, I am not convinced the knows gaming.
zackychuu ->
With v-sync and other buffering methods off, or at the game setting you use for the games you play, if you exceed 60FPS ever, 120 or 144HZ will offer some benefits. If you exceed 60FPS by a lot and often, the benefits increase. Only your eyes will tell you if it is worth the extra dough. Examples of benefits: reduction/elimination of tearing, increase in fluidity, better response times (generally higher refresh rate monitors have lower [better] response times)
http://uk.pcpartpicker.com/parts/mo...,2980,2900,2750,2700,2600,2500,2460,2410,2400
That should link to the UK version of PC Partpicker. Play with the criteria; I've started it with:
- 1920x1080
- all sizes 24" and larger
- 6ms response time or less
- sorted by price from low to high - there are six between £150 - £200 without taxes/delivery/etc.
The
LG E2742V-BN and the
Asus ML248H are the two highest rated of the six on the site, but do your own research, and if possible, go see any potential monitors in person and preferably in gaming use, optimally the games you play.