Ya bit you're in the boonies. No neighbours so it's fast and cheap. Here, where it's densely populated we get fucked because, like you've mentioned earlier, there is no competition so monopolies rule.
I don't live in the boonies...
Ya bit you're in the boonies. No neighbours so it's fast and cheap. Here, where it's densely populated we get fucked because, like you've mentioned earlier, there is no competition so monopolies rule.
If you have <10,000 pakies per square mile, you live in the boonies lolI don't live in the boonies...
If you have <10,000 pakies per square mile, you live in the boonies lol
no they hate how we are swimming in exotic pussy and they have annoying fat white girls in uggs
TSI Marc said:The rate change is not because of the change in cap, the costs have gone up significantly based on the actual usage on your tier and combined with the imminent rate changes we are expecting.
TSI Marc said:Of the $5, $4-$5 of it is because usage costs have gone up because users are using it more as was actually measured currently.
You're usually smart, I don't know where these obviously false claims are coming from so I'm exiting this conversation. You're wearing a BELL shirt, and that's cool. Everybody's gotta work somewhere..The fact of the matter is TekSavvy publicly shits on its customers and is known for taking weeks to resolve even minor issues. I just don't agree with accepting such terms just to save <$100/year.
Start is charging more than I'm paying Bell for the same 25/10 FTTN with the same cap. Also, the VDSL modem they're offering only has 802.11n while Bell is already on a model with 802.11ac. Say what you want about loyalty but the customer retention agents can see how long you've been a customer and treat you accordingly. I haven't paid the advertised price for as long as I can remember but I'll bet my ass that TekSavvy customers do.
You're usually smart, I don't know where these obviously false claims are coming from so I'm exiting this conversation. You're wearing a BELL shirt, and that's cool. Everybody's gotta work somewhere..
isn't DSL more expensive meg per meg then cable? Also if you live in the DT core or newer building I would suggest "beanfield" google them. they are installing their own fiber optic cables in buildings and therefore wont rely on bell or rogers! amazing prices. When I buy a condo sometime this year I will make sure it has beanfield fiber in it.
D:\Users\Adam>tracert 74.91.123.216
Tracing route to c-74-91-123-216.managed-ded.internap-nyc.nfoservers.com [74.91.
123.216]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms pfSense.localdomain [10.100.1.1]
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 13 ms 10 ms 11 ms 69.63.243.249
4 25 ms 16 ms 129 ms van58-9-231-29.dynamic.rogerstelecom.net [209.14
8.231.29]
5 23 ms 21 ms 21 ms 24.156.144.178
6 * * * Request timed out.
7 32 ms 34 ms 42 ms be2765.ccr41.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.45
.17]
8 34 ms 35 ms 34 ms be2717.ccr21.cle04.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.6.
222]
9 40 ms 43 ms 37 ms be2889.ccr41.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.47
.50]
10 37 ms 37 ms 48 ms be2324.ccr21.jfk04.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.47
.18]
11 38 ms 37 ms 39 ms 38.88.194.86
12 39 ms 98 ms 37 ms border2.pc2-bbnet2.ext1.nym.pnap.net [216.52.95.
79]
13 36 ms 37 ms 36 ms inap-b2.e3.router.nyc.nfoservers.com [70.42.74.2
54]
14 37 ms 36 ms 37 ms c-74-91-123-216.managed-ded.internap-nyc.nfoserv
ers.com [74.91.123.216]
Trace complete.