AAA
A Little Darkly
If you're satisfied in knowing that in 3-5 years your SSD will become read-only then you ignore all possible avenues to reduce write cycles. Another problem is the infinity of what's written and one day a dumpster diver will have that data. This is satisfactory for our through away culture because they really don't understand these repercussions. HDDs have a cache to alleviate some of the burden of a performance hit with the help of the OS disk scheduler and more so when doing parallel IO. It's all up to the user and their priorities. The 2nd link everyone should read no matter their configuration because it has many optimizations.
Honestly, the controller is more likely to take the shitter than the nand flash, had a first gen SSD, left page file and all the other crap that reads and writes often. the SSD lasted around 2.5 years. the controller hit the shitter, and the SSD was dead. RMA, got a newer and better SSD. was careful with it at first, then i thought to myself, if i have a SSD mind aswell make it work its ass off. you can put one or two of your fav games on it.
i get what youre saying, but for the average user, web browsing/installing and playing one game or so on the SSD, they wont hit the write limit on the SSD, and something else is definitely going to hit the shitter before the write cycle.
if he does do alot of file swapping and read/write intensive stuff, yes it will wear out. thats when you move things to a scratch disk.
Last edited: