[quote1242928214=S@lv_dor]
if the gov't wanted to do something they could easily do so by reducing the tax. next time you buy some peep how much of that isn't even paying for the product. this is why a further carbon tax is so fucking outrageous.
easiest way to fight back is to just use less petrol. if there's less demand then they're going to be forced to cut prices. europe caught onto that long ago by taxing the shit out of it and having the brains to use turbocharged 4cyl engines in the place of V8s.
i swapped cars not too long ago from a 2.4L auto sedan to a 1.6L manual hatch and the amount of fuel saved is significant. having a light car with a manual tranny is also significant because i don't need to push it over 3000rpm on the street to make it move well, and in hilly areas i can drop that shit into neutral and be cruising along at idle. hell most of the time i break the speed limit it's in idle!
or if you have an iphone i bet you could peep
http://www.torontogasprices.com/ constantly
[/quote1242928214]
1. engine load is a hidden gas consumer, that 1.6 liter goes rich when you step on the gas off gear or try to get up a hill, larger displacement engines typically operate overall on lower rpm's, and their load is always less because they generate more torque.
i dont know what car you had, and what car you got, but no 1.6 powered car that i have ever driven is worth driving below 3000 rpm, you might as well walk. Likewise large displacement cars have much better response, and work better with longer gears, because their powerband comes on sooner.
2. coasting in neutral consumes fuel, coasting in gear with your foot off the gas consumes zero fuel (untill you drop lower than 1400~1600 rpm depending on vehicle)