CS Pro Mod

[Nick P!]

http://cspromod.com

I'm trying this thing out and it seems pretty cool. Anyone played it?

 

[Fork Included]

all i want is a bash command, the ability to prone, and throw grenades back at people

 

[Shortbus]

[quote1265666959=Fork Included]
all i want is a bash command, the ability to prone, and throw grenades back at people
[/quote1265666959]

Call of duty?

 

[Fork Included]

[quote1265667097=Shortbus]
[quote1265666959=Fork Included]
all i want is a bash command, the ability to prone, and throw grenades back at people
[/quote1265666959]

Call of duty?
[/quote1265667097]

minus all the gay shit (read the call of duty threads)

also i never like the "wave" games, where you just keep re-spawning until one team wins.

 

[Propaganda]

Interesting......

 

[Fork Included]

so long as valve approves it..

they are pretty explicit about this being an .exe modification and a need to have "full version" of 1.6/source

seems like valve could VAC ban the whole thing if they dont like it.

 

[47]

fork, there are different modes in COD u nooby !

 

[Leroy]

I thought about hosting this, but they don't have the server files released yet?

 

[Nick P!]

I'm not sure but given the download page, it says Client + Server, so I would image if you have a CSS server, you will be able to run this server.

 

[OG buckshot jr]

Ok, I just read a fuckload of shit and I STILL have no idea what it's about. Just a little better graphics than 1.6? Source is that... ?

Fuck these cats, they're just re-making source the way THEY want it... too bad

 

[Nick P!]

Its the game mechanics of CS 1.3-1.6 + graphics of CS:S or better (eventually). New animations, new sounds, better radar, etc.

If you were a fan of CS 1.6, you will probably be a fan of this.

 

[Steve]

I played this when the first open beta came out. Complete trash.

 

[Fork Included]

what mechanics?

everyone keeps saying how 1.6 is different from source, i remember when i made the switch i did not notice anything out of the ordinary.

 

[Steve]

[quote1265730901=Fork Included]
what mechanics?

everyone keeps saying how 1.6 is different from source, i remember when i made the switch i did not notice anything out of the ordinary.
[/quote1265730901]


1.6 you can shoot through most walls
1.6 the nades are bricks
1.6 flashes dont do shit
1.6 you can no scope/qs with the awp

 

[Fork Included]

[quote1265731271=Steve]

1.6 you can shoot through most walls
1.6 the nades are bricks
1.6 flashes dont do shit
1.6 you can no scope/qs with the awp

[/quote1265731271]

1. because 9mm rounds made from lead should penetrate concrete...

2. ??

3. which is both good and bad... but i would rather see source flash's but with the ability to hide from them..

4. no scoping is gay, good riddance

 

[Steve]

although I liked some of those aspects in 1.6, when you put walling in css its just fucking gay.

no need to play a mod that makes css look shittier and play shittier.

css>1.6 anyways

 

[OG buckshot jr]

I've always loved the physics/mechanics of 1.6. I've only noticed truly "bad reg" when I moved to Source for TD.
This game (Source) has HORRID hitbox/registry/physics/mechanics - call it whatever you wanna call it, but when you deagle shoot a metre left of a guy's head and it's a headshot - there's problems.

But eitherway, I don't want to play a game that kids "magically reverse code-engineered" (laugh, valient effort). Like I said before, they're just re-making the original mod using their own shit, big hoo hoo. It'll still have the same problems this game has.

And I'd much rather play the ORIGINAL (and legit) game with problems than some custom gay shit with problems.

 

[Fork Included]

counterstrike on the crytec engine.. mmmmmmmm

 

[DarkSiege]

Just putting this out there, has anyone thought of having a 1.6 server for TD?