CSGO looks unimpressive at best. The graphics are hardly up to par with current generations of FPS's. Game looks like it should have come out in 2005(it probably should have LOLZ)
CS:GO looks aiight but without HL3 we aren't going to see a new graphics engine. HURRY THE FUCK UP VALVE!!!
Meh, Graphics are lamo no matter what. My issue is more about game play, interaction with the environment, and how well it works over the internet. This game so far is geared for all the 1.6 scrimers, and the strategies/game play of scriming in general.
Valve as said they will have custom servers. Which is good but how well will a game that's being made for 5v5 upscale to 16v16? How about the maps, again made for 5v5 upscale to 16v16? How about a mother fucking proper admin in your damn server you lazy fucking slobs? Okay that last one is a long shot but I don't see why they can't do it!
I personally don't give a shit for graphics. I mean, all they did was add zippers on the player skins, and more milk cartons on the floor of de_dust2 so you can trip/get blocked and rage-quit on ... Oh, and completely murdered the crosshair so it looks like some alien gun from Halo 2: Orphus of Jizz. As long as the gameplay still exists, and they take out garbage physics from source and put back some real cs physics like 1.5/6, then I'm good.
Getting stuck on a milk carton is so realistic though!
don't know what's causing this over-abundance of milk cartons all over the place.
They all have pictures of Keeripes on them...
Its stilll gonna do better than BF3 with half the cost to make it. Valve wins! We lose!
"do better than bf3" what do you mean by that?
If you are about to argue that the game play of another cs rehash out does battlefield, you are on some strong haterade.
BF > CS .
BF is a shit-ton of fun, but I seriously question anyone's judgement when they claim BF has superior gameplay. There's a good reason why the fundamentals of CS haven't changed and why Battlefield will never be played at the same competitive level as CS.