I have put lots of money into my education and I can honestly say that I have learnt more in working and hands on experience than I have from any teacher or class. So I don't agree that the Y generation would rather invest in themselves than in a house it's that high schools and the workforce market dictate that you NEED post secondary education and that going into high levels of debt is worth it. Education is an intangible asset than can be relatively useless unless you learn how to use the knowledge.
Personally I think the education system is the biggest money grab right now because it's "required" to succeed and you have to buy books and this and that which at the cheapest university in the country (Windsor) is still $3500 per semester. I find myself against the grain in the article though, I couldn't wait to buy a car and I'm excited to buy a house and mow my lawn with a john deer.
I think differently about education. Sure, I can agree with the obvious that it's a money grab (or should I say, too expensive, at least here in North America), but tell me it isn't worth it.
Also, I think about a university education like this: it's what you learn, rather
how you learned it. What I mean by that is, most courses within a given program, yes, will teach you things you should know etc., however that's just the foundation. I think the main point is to teach people critical thinking, problem solving, and best one of all (certainly the hardest for all of these dumb-ass kids failing high school, and the category of grading that no one seems to get)
applying that skill-set to not only solve a problem, but to build upon previous solutions and
innovate or
advance a field.
I don't think education is, right now, is geared to 'get you up to speed' so you can work in the field, rather to get you up to speed and teach you how to hone your abilities to get
beyond what is already established within the field.
I appreciate education, it's taught me a
lot more than what was in my textbooks.